02-27-2024, 09:35 AM
Sswz Covid: will we have new generation vaccines in 2023?
On August 5, Canadian singer and musician Neil Young sued Donald Trump in US federal court, accusing him of copyright infringement for using two of his songs 鈥?鈥淩ockin' in the Free World鈥?and 鈥淒evil's Sidewalk鈥?鈥?during a June rally in Tulsa, asics gelkayano 14 in Oklahoma. Young 鈥?who became a US citizen a few months ago precisely for the purpose of voting in the presidential elections in November 鈥?said he could not allow his music to be used 芦as the soundtrack of a divisive and anti-American campaign, converse schuhe based on hatred and ignorance". The lawsuit filed by Young comes after Trump had used some of his songs in election campaign contexts on several occasions from 2015 onwards. In 2018 Young said that, given how copyright works in the United States, it is notthere were margins to prevent Trump from doing so. Now, however, something may have changed: if Young's cause has positive results for him, many other artists could choose to do the same. Even just stopping at Trump, in fact, among the artists who have spoken out against the use of some of their songs by the US president there are, among others, Rihanna, Elton John, Pharrell Williams, Axl Rose, R.E.M. and Adele. After speaking about the issue with several intellectual property experts, the New York Times explained that the topic is "complicated" and it is not at all certain that a judge can agree with Young. In the United States, in fact, most electoral committees have "the same freedom as discos or radios in playing songs"; he can use the songs he wants and he can do it thanks to the agreements that the singers have with companies ...
On August 5, Canadian singer and musician Neil Young sued Donald Trump in US federal court, accusing him of copyright infringement for using two of his songs 鈥?鈥淩ockin' in the Free World鈥?and 鈥淒evil's Sidewalk鈥?鈥?during a June rally in Tulsa, asics gelkayano 14 in Oklahoma. Young 鈥?who became a US citizen a few months ago precisely for the purpose of voting in the presidential elections in November 鈥?said he could not allow his music to be used 芦as the soundtrack of a divisive and anti-American campaign, converse schuhe based on hatred and ignorance". The lawsuit filed by Young comes after Trump had used some of his songs in election campaign contexts on several occasions from 2015 onwards. In 2018 Young said that, given how copyright works in the United States, it is notthere were margins to prevent Trump from doing so. Now, however, something may have changed: if Young's cause has positive results for him, many other artists could choose to do the same. Even just stopping at Trump, in fact, among the artists who have spoken out against the use of some of their songs by the US president there are, among others, Rihanna, Elton John, Pharrell Williams, Axl Rose, R.E.M. and Adele. After speaking about the issue with several intellectual property experts, the New York Times explained that the topic is "complicated" and it is not at all certain that a judge can agree with Young. In the United States, in fact, most electoral committees have "the same freedom as discos or radios in playing songs"; he can use the songs he wants and he can do it thanks to the agreements that the singers have with companies ...
stiefel damen